
“Despite that advice, the plan moved forward,” the committee’s filing states. Scott Perry, R-Pa., Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., and Louie Gohmert, R-Texas. Hutchinson told the committee that the counsel’s office had concluded that the alternate electors plan was not legally sound potentially as early as November 2021, and that this conclusion was raised during multiple meetings at the White House involving Meadows, other Trump associates like Trump’s former personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, and members of Congress including Reps. 6 to certify the Electoral College vote count. In an April court filing, the select committee cited sections of Hutchinson’s testimony as proof of the former chief’s involvement in the effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election and that he had pursued unlawful plans to make that happen.Īccording to the filing, Hutchinson told the committee that the White House Counsel’s Office repeatedly objected on legal grounds to a plan to push Republican officials in battleground states that had voted for Biden to send alternate, pro-Trump slates of electors to Congress when lawmakers met on Jan. The select committee’s legal battle against Meadows, who has sued to block the panel’s subpoenas, may offer clues on how Hutchinson’s testimony could be used in the hearings.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., surrounded by reporters after House investigators issued a subpoena to McCarthy and four other GOP lawmakers. The same source said Hutchinson will likely make another appearance before the committee, possibly during the upcoming public hearings, according to CNN. In fact, following her most recent deposition last month, a source reportedly told CNN that Hutchinson believes she’s being forced to testify due to Meadows’s refusal to comply with his own subpoena. Unlike her former boss, whose refusal to cooperate with House investigators has earned him a Justice Department referral for criminal contempt charges, Hutchinson has appeared before the committee on three separate occasions since the beginning of this year. She also emailed Georgia officials directly following Meadows’s trip to attend that state’s election audit, according to the subpoena, and was present for other key meetings and conversations at the White House leading up to Jan. 6 but she’d been with Trump during his speech at the “Stop the Steal” rally on the Ellipse, where he urged his supporters to “fight like hell” before promising to march with them to the Capitol.

(Shay Horse/NurPhoto via Getty Images)Īccording to her subpoena, Hutchinson was not only at the White House on Jan. Jamie Raskin is ranked on the list of 3048 popular Educator.Far-right supporters of Donald Trump gather near the Capitol on Jan.If two unmarried celebrities are seen in public together, they are often described as “dating” which means they were seen in public together, and it is not clear whether they are merely friends, exploring a more intimate relationship, or are romantically involved. Jamie Raskin prefers not to tell the details of marital status & divorce.ĭating is to describe a stage in a person’s life when he or she is actively pursuing romantic relationships with different people. Let’s take a look at Jamie Raskin past relationships, ex-girlfriends and previous hookups. Check back often as we will continue to update this page with new relationship details. Jamie Raskin keeps his personal and love life private. Full body measurements, dress & shoe size will be updated soon. Jamie Raskin’s height Unknown & weight Not Available right.

Primary Income source Educator (profession). Jamie Raskin earned the money being a professional Educator. According to Wikipedia, Forbes, IMDb & Various Online resources, famous Educator Jamie Raskin’s net worth is $1-5 Million at the age of 57 years old.
